THE WOLF OF WALL STREET (2013)

wolf-of-wall-street-poster2-610x903

The Wiseguys of Wall Street.

Comparisons to Goodfellas will be coming in thick and fast with this ‘real life’ tale of Jordan Belfort, a stockbroker who broke a lot of rules to live the debauched life he so desired.

The voice-over for one. Was it just me or did Leo even sound like Ray at times? I don’t think this was a conscious thing but his voice had a little Henry Hill in it. (Kaaarrrrennnn).

The sprawling tale, taking the viewer though time to tell the story.

The fantastic soundtrack.

The reasons it’s not a 5 star film-

David Mamet once said:

EVERY SCENE MUST BE DRAMATIC. THAT MEANS: THE MAIN CHARACTER MUST HAVE A SIMPLE, STRAIGHTFORWARD, PRESSING NEED WHICH IMPELS HIM OR HER TO SHOW UP IN THE SCENE.

Now, as with Lincoln, we saw too many scenes with Lincoln giving his speeches, and it bored me to tears, Marty gives us too many Leo speeches, that don’t do any more than the previous one did.

I get the plot ones but other than that we get that Jordan is obviously a great rallyer of troops. We get it. Tighten up.
It is not propelling the story forward. Leo, as with DDL, is a great actor and I enjoy watching him (he reminded me of a young Jack Nicholson at times) but I don’t need to see the same scene with different words. It’s boring.

The debauchery is over-egged as well, too many scenes saying the same thing.

The film ultimately wasn’t tight enough. People talk about how long it was and in this case it was true. However, if the 3 hours contained a composition that merited the time then cool, bring it.
Roger Ebert once said: “No good movie is long enough and no bad movie is short enough”.

The film was a fun ride, no doubt and had a great deal of jokes and humour in it. The best scenes were with all the brokers, old mates, kicking it verbally. Very funny. The original dinner and the selling of the pen right up to the interviews, Usual Suspects style, were by far the funniest and it was a shame more wasn’t made of their relationships, I think it would have made for a more satisfying entertaining outcome.

Instead we were shown the relationship with Naomi a little bit too much. I get it, they love each other, she hates him, move on.

Everybody was great in it (I’m looking the other way when it comes to Jon Bernthal here) and the direction was as good as you’d expect from one of the greatest directors America (nay the world) has produced. The mighty Thelma Schoonmaker was doing her thing, but maybe there needed to be some more brutality in the editing room. It must be hard to be too close to the subject in order to see it clearly and through the eyes of an audience member, but people change with time and their aesthetic tastes change. Fair play.

Terence Winter (The Sopranos, Boardwalk Empire) was on screenwriting duties and delivered a script worthy of the great director.

Scorsese’s last great film (IMO) , was Kundun, in 1997 (apart from the George Harrison doc, which was wonderful).

I haven’t fully enjoyed the Leo/Marty collaborations, not that they’ve been shit, merely not nearly as good as the Bobby/Marty masterpieces.
The Wolf of Wall Street has probably been the most enjoyable of their pairings, but it’s not quite the masterpiece it feels like it should have been.

It is, however, very enjoyable and worth a watch, it’s a shame it misses the mark, it could have been as magnificent as Jordan Belfort’s appetite for narcotics, women and money.

3.5/5

BUY THE BLU-RAY DVD HERE

DOWNLOAD THE FILM ON iTUNES HERE

GRUDGE MATCH (2013)

grudge-match-poster

The Raging Bull versus the Italian Stallion or Jake La Motta versus Rocky Balboa.

These were probably the tag-line pitches that had the execs seeing dollar signs and foaming at the mouth (cos that’s how they roll).

“I mean even if it’s not a good movie, Stallone and De Niro! C’maaannnnn, it’s gotta make money, right?”

You might ask why Robert De Niro would accept this doomed to ridicule project.

It’s not like he needs it. His IMDB says that he was in 7 films in 2013 (this being one of them), so he really didn’t need to be in a film where he would have to work out and work hard, but fair play to him, especially at his age.
I think we are starting to see some wonderful performances again filled with nuance and truth. He was great in Silver Linings PLaybook.

Well, apart from the inevitable fun it would be to do it, the script isn’t half bad, Kim Basinger, the always wonderful, Alan Arkin and of course, the Sly-ster. Why the frak not?

Stallone’s been churning out Expendables like it was going out of style. (1st one in 2010, 3rd in 2014).

I haven’t seen any of them but I think that’s down to the fact that Statham is in them and….well…..I just can’t do it to myself, I got through ten minutes of the first one before I just had to STOP….Hammer Time.

Ultimately, this is a highly enjoyable movie that defies the odds and raises itself above the level it seemed destined to remain at. Everybody’s good in it, I was not even annoyed at Jon Bernthal (who managed to spike my levels of vexation in The Walking Dead), I didn’t say he was good in this, merely ‘not annoying’.

I watched this on a Sunday afternoon and it was perfect for this time of day. Not too taxing, entertaining and pacey.

It tells the story of a 30 year old rivalry and manages to deal with it with subtlety as opposed to feeling like you’ve been hit over the head with the emotional Hollywood hammer.

A lot of the jokes were in the trailer but that didn’t stop them from still being funny and a lot of that is down to Kevin Hart. He seems to have cornered a market for himself in passionate, emotionally retarded, men-children. He’s damn good at it and very funny too.

Stallone gives a nice performance here playing the world weary and De Niro plays the selfish sprinkled with the right amount of humanity and pathos.

A lot better, or at least more enjoyable than a lot of the drivel on offer.
Fun.

3/5

BUY THE BLU-RAY DVD HERE

DOWNLOAD THE FILM ON iTUNES HERE